Newt Gingrich Using Crowd Photo Used By John Kerry

Microstock photos are stock photographs that are for sale at places like, and lots of other places. There are even some sites where you can get microstock photographs for free.

Let me be clear, I’m not knocking microstock photos. A lot of times, you can find some really good photos that show just the right “thing” that matches the message that you’re trying to convey.

The original twitter bird was a microstock photo, that should give you an idea of how popular these types of images are and how much designers rely on them.

The problem with a microstock photo, is that unless you pay a lot of money, you don’t own the exclusive rights to use the photo. You essentially license the use of the photograph on your product. Depending on where you buy, there may be different prices for different sizes, resolutions and for the type of media (website, print, etc.) that you intend to use the photo on.

There are millions of photos available for sale on various subjects and that convey all sorts of different moods, messages, etc.

So, with millions of photos available, and possibly thousands of sites to obtain microstock photographs from, how does something like this happen?

Gingrich using John Kerry's old campaign photo
Gingrich using John Kerry's old campaign photo

Really, I think it’s funny that Gingrich is using a photo that John Kerry already used. There’s just something ironic, or is it moronic? about the whole thing.

I don’t think the designers did this on purpose. I think they honestly didn’t know that Kerry, of all people, had already used the same image a few years ago.

By the way, if you’re interested in buying the same image of supporters for your campaign, go to Getty Images to buy it.

The folks over at were the first to report on this.

Fact Checking The Republicans “Pledge” To America

Didn’t Newt Gingrich come up with a “contract” before? Why go with a “pledge” now instead of a “contract?” Is it a matter of wavering commitment?

Make sure you read the rest of the report either on Fox business or on rendered its verdict on the Republicans’ “Pledge to America” and says it “falls short on some of its facts.” is a nonprofit website that says it is a non-partisan “‘consumer advocate’ for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics.” A project at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, is funded by the Annenberg Foundation.

Here’s what FactCheck didn’t like — do you agree?

For the full rundown, go to

The Economy notes that page 5 of the Pledge says: “Our economy has declined and our debt has mushroomed with the loss of millions of jobs.”

But says: “It’s true that the economy lost nearly 8.4 million jobs from the peak of employment in December, 2007 to the bottom of the job slump in December of last year. More than half (4.4 million) were lost before Obama took office. The economy has regained 723,000 jobs since hitting bottom, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.” notes that page 14 of the Pledge says: “Private sector unemployment remains at or near 10 %, jobless claims continue to soar, and the only parts of the economy expanding are government and our national debt.” says: “It’s true that the unemployment rate is 9.6%, but that’s actually down from the peak of 10.1 % reached last October. It’s also true that new claims for unemployment compensation – “jobless claims” – continue at a high level. But they are actually running 8% lower than they did at their worst levels, so they are slowly declining, not soaring.”

It adds: “And it’s not the case that only government is growing. The opposite is true — the private sector has gained a net total of 763,000 jobs this year, according to the BLS.” also says: “But at the same time, the total number of government jobs has declined by about 40,000, despite a transitory spike in hiring by the Census Bureau to conduct its decennial head count. That spike is now over. The decline in overall government employment is mostly due to public schools shedding 62,000 positions as local property tax rolls decline due to plunging real-estate values.”

Health Care Reform notes that page 26 of the Pledge says: “The Obama Administration has been forced to acknowledge that the new law will force some 87 million Americans to drop their current coverage.” says: “This is a misrepresentation. It’s true that the president over-promised when he repeatedly told Americans that ‘if you like your health care plan, you keep your health care plan.’ As we noted shortly before the bill passed, he can’t make that promise to everyone. It’s also true that after the bill passed, the administration released estimates showing that only about 55% of large employers and 34% of small employers would be offering the same insurance coverage in 2013 as they do now, under “grandfathering” rules. That works out to about 87 million workers — more or less — whose policies are likely to change in some way.”

It adds: “”But it’s deceptive of the GOP to claim that employers of these workers will ‘drop’ their coverage. It would be accurate to say they are expected to change it. In many cases policies will be replaced by more generous coverage, accompanied by government subsidies to help pay the premiums. Some workers will lose grandfathered status merely because their employers buy substantially similar policies from a different insurance company.” notes: “In other cases coverage might get worse — plans would lose grandfathered status if they were significantly changed to cut benefits; raise co-insurance payments, copays or deductibles; lower employer contributions; or add or tighten caps on payments. But while the law would allow this, it certainly does not ‘force’ employers to reduce coverage, as many have done in the past.” notes that page 28 of the Pledge says: “Roughly 16,500 IRS auditors, agents, and other employees may be needed to collect the hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes levied on the American people by the new health care law.” says: “This is simply not true. As we reported last March, this figure ‘stems from a partisan analysis based on guesswork and false assumptions, and compounded by outright misrepresentation.’

It adds: “For an eye-opening account of how Republican staff members of the House Ways and Means committee came up with this inflated figure, see our Ask FactCheck item posted March 30. Most of what the IRS will do under the law is hand out tax credits, not collect penalties.”